The days of process management are fading away. Work tasks that can be standardized are becoming automated by machines or outsourced to foreign entities. This is ushering in the era of knowledge creation where the goal of organizations is to discover how to find and take advantage of new value in the market. Maintaining the status quo is becoming easier with cheaper methods to execute repeatable processes; the emphasis has shifted to continuous growth. Executive leadership teams now realize that creativity is a critical investment. We are living in an era of leadership that facilitates innovation.
This shift has uncovered two significant challenges for the modern leader. One challenge is that teams are needed in the creative process, because of the expanded breadth of knowledge required to understand the complexity of modern organizational problems and solutions. Unfortunately, research shows that groups routinely underperform individuals in creative performance. While it is perceived that teams are more innovative, groups inhibit creative ideas instead of stimulating idea generation. This is due to individuals fixating on how they are being perceived in the group versus focusing on unique ideas.
The second leadership challenge is that the historical practices for running an effective organization run counter to creating an innovative environment. Management is about bringing order and structure, while creativity is often about breaking out of what already is to explore what could be. Famed psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi captured the traits of the innovative person, finding that they are highly energetic, challenging, and playful. Creative people’s realities root in fantasy. They are highly independent, curious, and divergent thinkers open to new ideas. Most management practices have focused on bringing clarity, order, and alignment to an organization; an open-minded, creative mentality can run counter to this approach.
Reversing the innovation and management paradox is not found in a new structure or new organizational architecture. Rather, what successfully impacts invigorating creativity in an organization is found in adopting a different mindset towards organizational leadership. Facilitating innovation with one’s team puts the focus on creating the optimal working environment for experts to succeed in managing their areas of specialty. Imagine an organization broken into four intertwined quadrants: culture, process, team dynamics, and facilitative leadership. Each of these four areas is critical in its own regard, yet uniquely contributes to each of the other three areas. Leadership extends into all these domains, in that managers ceding control and giving empowerment and authority to the most knowledgeable enables team creativity. A shift of this nature is the cornerstone of enabling and facilitating innovation.
In the context of innovation and generating creative ideas, leadership is the catalyst for creative success. Encouraging leadership can inspire just as quickly as pessimistic leadership can mute risky initiatives. The role of the leader in the innovation space is to guide people into sharing their insights, exploring things in ways that may be new or even uncomfortable, and generating ideas far beyond what would have typically come from a usual conversation.
Being innovative and creating out of nothing begs the individual to have the freedom to experiment and explore. In innovation management, leaders do well for their teams when they award autonomy and remain judgment-free during the creative process. As the creator refines their process of how they innovate, it is necessary for the facilitative leader to encourage this behavior instead of fixating on the abnormal deviations. This empowers the creator to concentrate on ideas. Instead of focusing on avoiding reprimanded.
For example, artist Rayce Bird routinely runs wind sprints during design breaks to reinvigorate the cardiovascular system which he believes opens the flow of creative ideas. The typical management reaction would be to stop the running and to have a crucial conversation on how bad the optics of exercising in the middle of work are. Yet, to build that creative environment, you must encourage that behavior. Join them the next time they do an atypical activity, and then start a dialogue on how it worked for you or didn’t and what to try next time.
Autonomy associates with releasing control to explore ambiguity. Shift the focus from hitting the deadline to encouraging the team to be curious and to explore beyond the surface level. Doing so enables the innovator to delve into their deep and focused work, which breeds creation. The shallow work that resides in the structured norms of an organization results in benchmarking competitors and maintaining the status quo. The deep work that explores ambiguous relationships, social connections and complexities lead to the market shifting disruptive innovation. Take a quick self-assessment on how decisions had been made over the past year. If your focus has drifted too far into execution, build exploratory checkpoints into your goals with plans to temper decisiveness. Before making decisions, have the team propose at least three alternative solutions with the intent to find those hidden connections and opportunities.
Bring problems to your team, not solutions. When you convey preconceived solutions to your team, you close the door on their insights. Changing their role from the innovators to the implementers. I’ve worked with numerous clients that would insist on conducting closed-door strategic planning sessions with the intent to not include their team until they were ready to reveal their grand vision to the organization later. During these events, the same complaint would routinely occur that their people weren’t creative and had a limited vision. The fallacy in each of their comments was that they had never given their teams a chance to be innovative. Their work model was to wait for the executive level solutions and then execute.
To see if you’ve fallen into this trap, reflect on how your strategic planning sessions are conducted. Then consider the issues over the past few months and count the solutions pre-decided by you or identified by your team. If the realization shocks you, focus your efforts on bringing your team problems. Then step back into a coaching role where you provide perspective instead of direction. This will not only engage your team into the process but will also start to leverage the brainpower of the whole organization.
The last emphasis is to encourage creativity and be patient enough to let it develop. Not every gamble nor initiative will pay off. Venture capitalists know this well: They will bet on ten companies, expecting that nine will fail, happy to see just one of them makes it big enough to cover all the other investments. Few investors believe that success comes without tolerance for failure.
Pfizer went through this same process in the early 1990s during its quest to create a high blood pressure and chest pain medication. Pfizer nearly shelved the product after unsuccessful trials. However, tests uncovered that it could address erectile dysfunction. This patience resulted in a dramatic market shift from the original vision and a twenty-year, $32 billion revenue run for Viagra. While the intent was specific in the beginning, the innovation cycle is never a straight path. Moreover, never does it end exactly as predicted.
Maintaining patience to see things through to the outcome pays huge dividends. There is a similar model with analogous learning. Time and thought stitch together random connections to achieve a deeper level of understanding. This approach is getting more difficult in the modern workplace. The expectation is to accomplish tasks as efficiently as possible, eliminating any excess wastes. While corporate planning starts in a beginning-to-end fashion to allocate resources properly, it doesn’t account for a dynamic market and shifting priorities. The agile approach builds in short, periodic checkpoints in the process. This checks on hitting customer expectations. These checkpoints enable prime opportunities to continue to explore previously unrecognized opportunities that can be leveraged.
Your role as a leader is changing from complexity manager to expert enablement. You must become the facilitator of innovation that encourages creative thought, while difficult, provides long-term organizational success. Changing specific actions to shape your approach to leadership can make significant gains in building an innovative team. These actions begin with how you lead your organization. Award autonomy so the team can develop self-mastery. Encourage them to explore other opportunities before they make decisions. Give the organization a chance to be creative by presenting them with problems without fixed solutions. Lastly, be patient with the team as they evolve through this process. History’s most treasured inventions and ideas of significance were never developed with the highest level of efficiency. The creative process is an exploration that is messy, wasteful, and time-consuming. However, it’s also the difference between being average and extraordinary.
The innovation environment model framework designs to help understand the various dynamics involved with organizational creativity. The model consists of 66 common strategies for facilitating innovation in four interconnected areas: Culture, Process, Team Dynamics, and Leadership.
Copyright © 2020 9m Consulting - All Rights Reserved.